An underlying theme in year-end tax planning for high-net-worth individuals last year was planning around the impending sunset of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). That theme continues this year, albeit with even more uncertainty. The election of former President Donald Trump along with a Republican majority in the House and Senate increase the likelihood that many of the TCJA’s provisions may be extended before they expire at the end of 2025. But for now, we don’t know what will stay, what will go, how long certain provisions might be extended and what other legislative changes might be in the works.
So, how should individuals plan amid such uncertainty? We’ve assembled a list of a dozen year-end planning ideas that fall into five potentially impactful categories. Consider them with your advisers — this year and next — to remain adaptable and respond quickly to changing legislative conditions.
Absent new legislation, the TCJA is set to expire at the end of 2025, resulting in the following major changes:
Following the election, expiration of the TCJA appears less likely. Similar to the process used to pass the TCJA in 2017, Republicans can use budget reconciliation to extend many of the TCJA’s key tax provisions. However, legislation passed via the reconciliation process necessarily comes with an expiration date. Under this scenario, taxpayers get short-term certainty, but the long-term tax picture remains uncertain — basically the environment taxpayers have operated under for the last six years. In another scenario, Republicans eliminate the Senate filibuster, and they pass permanent tax legislation.
In either case, the current tax environment will most likely continue in some form. Last year, we discussed the strategy of accelerating income into 2024 and 2025 to take advantage of lower tax rates while they still existed. However, in the current environment, you may find it makes sense to continue tried and true income tax planning strategies, such as deferring income and accelerating deductions. However, since we may not have clarity on the tax environment until later next year, remain vigilant and talk frequently with your tax advisers throughout 2025.
The annual gift tax exclusion, which is the amount a donor can gift free of transfer tax to an individual, is $18,000 in 2024 (an increase of $1,000 from the prior year). Married couples can double this amount by either gifting separately to an individual or electing to split gifts on a properly filed gift tax return.
TAKE NOTE: The annual gift exclusion limit will increase by another $1,000 to $19,000 in 2025.
Absent new legislation, we warned last year that that the expiration of the TCJA at the end of 2025 would halve the estate and gift tax exemption from approximately $14 million per individual to approximately $7 million. Following the election, the probability that the lifetime exemption remains at current levels is much higher, but there is no guarantee Congress will act. Furthermore, any extension of the current estate tax exemption level could be temporary.
If your estate is above the exemption amount, consider reducing your estate tax liability. Since the current estate tax environment is about as good as it will get absent full repeal, it makes sense to take advantage of the large exemption available now. Additionally, transferring assets out of your estate today freezes the value of your assets and shifts future appreciation out of your estate.
If your estate is under the exemption amount, it may make sense to continue focusing on income tax basis planning. Assets includible in your estate at death receive a step up in tax basis to the current fair market value. Holding on to low-basis assets until death can provide significant income tax benefits to your heirs.
End of the year is a great time to review your estate plan and ensure it still meets both tax and non-tax goals.
Advanced Planning Tips
Contribution limits for select retirement accounts in 2024:
Under age 50 | Including catch up for age 50 and older | |
---|---|---|
401(k)/403(b)/457 Deferral Limit | 23,000 | 30,500 |
Regular/ROTH IRA limits** | 7,000 | 8,000 |
SIMPLE 401(k)/SIMPLE IRA | 16,000 | 19,500 |
Defined Contribution Plan Limits (including employer and employee contributions) | 69,000 | 76,500 |
* Earned income limits apply to all figures above ** AGI limits apply to ROTH contributions
NOTE: Beginning in 2025, individuals ages 60 to 63 are eligible to make an enhanced catch-up contribution of $11,250. The total amount these eligible individuals can defer to their 401(k), 403(b) and 457 plans will be $34,750 in 2025.
To ROTH or Not to ROTH?
Historically low-income tax rates have led many investors to believe they should make after-tax contributions to ROTH accounts while tax rates are low, and take tax-free ROTH withdrawals in retirement when tax rates will presumably be higher. For individuals with a choice between pre-tax and ROTH retirement contributions, the answer may not be straightforward.
Tax rates certainly impact the decision as to whether to ROTH or not but so do other factors, such as life circumstances and tax phaseouts. Having a mix of tax-free, tax-deferred and taxable accounts, i.e., tax diversification, provides flexibility during working years and in retirement to adjust to both personal and legislative changing tax conditions. Drawing from different tax buckets in retirement can allow you to smooth your income and manage your tax rates. Discuss with your tax adviser where best to save your retirement dollars.
Reminder: Flex Spending/Transportation/Dependent Care Accounts
Many employers’ annual enrollment period is near year-end. Do not forget about optimizing contributions to flexible spending and dependent care accounts ($3,300 limit each in 2025) and transportation spending accounts ($325 limit per month in 2025). Contributions to these plans avoid FICA self-employment tax as well as federal and state income taxes. Be aware that subject to some exceptions, unused dollars may be forfeited.
Advanced Planning Tip
ROTH IRAs and ROTH 401(k)s remain some of the most potent tax planning vehicles available. They allow for tax-free growth and tax-free withdrawals. Furthermore, they are not subject to required minimum distributions. With marginal income tax rates at historic lows, now may be the time to consider converting assets into ROTH retirement accounts.
A ROTH conversion might make sense in the following situations:
Advanced Planning Tips
Beginning in 2024, the $100,000 maximum annual amount for QCDs is now indexed for inflation. Taxpayers 70 ½ and older can distribute up to $105,000 from an IRA direct to charity in 2024 and count that amount toward any required minimum distribution (RMD).
The following example illustrates the benefit of using the QCD strategy, versus taking an IRA distribution and then making a charitable deduction. Assume a married couple filing a joint return has:
This couple could save nearly $5,000 by using a QCD versus taking their RMD and gifting to charity.
QCD to Charity | Cash to Charity | |||
Non-qualified portfolio income | $250,000 | $250,000 | ||
RMD | $50,000 | $50,000 | ||
QCD | $(50,000) | $- | ||
Pretax income | $250,000 | $300,000 | ||
Itemized deduction | $10,000 | $60,000 | ||
Standard deduction | $29,200 | $29,200 | ||
Greater of item. or Std. | $$29,200 | $$60,000 | ||
Taxable income | $220,800 | $240,000 | ||
Tax liability | $43,685 | $39,077 | ||
A QCD effectively reduces your adjusted gross income (AGI). This can keep you in a lower tax bracket and avoid certain thresholds, such as for the net investment income tax (NIIT). Additionally, a lower AGI can help keep you under the thresholds at which higher Medicare Part B and prescription drug coverage premiums begin.
Advanced Planning Tip
With the S&P 500 up over 25% year-to-date in 2024, many taxpayers are sitting on large, unrealized capital gains. If you are charitably inclined, consider funding your charitable gifts with appreciated securities held for more than a year.
Assume a married couple filing jointly:
If the couple donates appreciated stock worth $50,000 (originally purchased for $15,000) that has been held for at least one year, they will receive a charitable deduction for the fair market value of the stock and avoid recognizing gain. In this example, selling the stock for $50,000 and donating the proceeds would cost the taxpayers over $6,500 more in taxes.
Donate Appreciated Stock | Sell then Donate Appreciated Stock | |||
Nonportfolio income | $400,000 | $400,000 | ||
Long-term cap gain | $- | $35,000 | ||
Pretax income | $400,000 | $435,000 | ||
State & local tax | $10,000 | $10,000 | ||
Charitable deduction | $50,000 | $50,000 | ||
Itemized deductions | $60,000 | $60,000 | ||
Taxable income | $340,000 | $375,000 | ||
Regular tax liability | $67,685 | $72,935 | ||
Net investment tax | $- | $1,299 | ||
Tax liability | $67,685 | $74,234 | ||
Advanced Planning Tip
Given that many taxpayers no longer itemize following the implementation of the TCJA, one common strategy is to bunch a large number of deductions in a single year, itemize in that year and then rely on the standard deduction in other years.
Assume a married couple filing jointly:
Rather than contributing $15,000 every year to charity and receiving no tax benefit, since the standard deduction will be higher, these taxpayers should consider bunching their charitable contributions in one year. By establishing a donor advised fund (DAF), the taxpayers can make deductible charitable contributions upfront and then make distributions to charities of their choice in subsequent years. In the bunching example, the taxpayers save $7,200 of federal tax, and the charities still receive their annual $15,000 contribution as intended. Note that the expiration of the TCJA may affect the viability of this strategy.
Charitable Bunching | Without Bunching | ||||||||
2023 Tax Year | 2024 Tax Year | 2025 Tax Year | 2023-2025 | ||||||
Nonportfolio income | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | |||||
State & local tax | $10,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | |||||
Charitable contributions | $45,000 | $- | $- | $15,000 | |||||
Itemized deductions | $55,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $25,000 | |||||
Standard deduction | $27,700 | $29,200 | $29,200 | $29,200 | |||||
Greater of item. or Std. | $55,000 | $29,200 | $29,200 | $29,200 | |||||
Taxable income | $345,000 | $370,800 | $370,800 | $370,800 | |||||
Tax liability | $69,600 | $75,077 | $75,077 | $75,077 | |||||
3-Year Total Tax Liability: | $219,754 | $226,954 | |||||||
Many taxpayers are sitting on large capital gains at the end of 2024. If you are one of them, consider the following planning items:
The NIIT applies an additional 3.8% tax on net investment income for taxpayers with AGI in excess of $250,000 for married filing joint or $200,000 for single. While not a new tax in 2024, planning to mitigate the NIIT remains important. To reduce this tax, consider:
Advanced Planning Tip
If your address of record is in a disaster area in 2024 (and there are many), you may be eligible for taxpayer relief. Millions of individual taxpayers are eligible to defer making tax payments. Especially given the current interest rate environment, deferring tax payments can make good financial sense.
For example, taxpayers in the entire state of Florida have until May 1, 2025, to file and pay any tax due on their 2024 returns. Additionally, Florida taxpayers will not need to pay their fourth quarter 2024 estimate normally due January 15, 2025, until May 1. Consult your tax adviser to confirm eligibility.
Especially for residents of states such as California and New York, state income taxes represent a significant portion of an individual’s tax liability. Relocating your tax residency is a viable tax planning strategy. However, it is not to be taken lightly. Building the right fact pattern that is supportable and capable of withstanding a state tax audit takes time and thought. Especially if you anticipate a significant future tax event, talk to your tax adviser sooner rather than later.
The planning areas above are potentially meaningful strategies to consider with your tax advisers over the next year. Talk with them before year-end to see what makes the most sense for your tax situation and to create a plan.
Contact Joe Falbo or a member of your service team to discuss this topic further.
Cohen & Company is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. Information contained in this post is considered accurate as of the date of publishing. Any action taken based on information in this blog should be taken only after a detailed review of the specific facts, circumstances and current law with your professional advisers.